Bad for Banks, Good for You

People hate banks.  Especially US banks.

In 2008, when President George W. Bush signed into law the biggest corporate bailouts in history, banks became the enemy.  They are retirement killers, staffed by toga-party heathens.  They are social pariahs.  Few mutual fund managers dare to buy them.  And this is what makes them great.

The Frost Report has been recommending bank stocks during every dip in the market since 2008 (which has been a great strategy), and things only look better for the future.

As of Oct 3, 2012, the six largest US lenders - including Bank of America, Citigroup, and JP Morgan - earned a combined $63 billion in profits.  In Q2, Wells Fargo had its most profitable quarter in 160 years.  Despite this, many bank shares are still trading at below book value, and at single-digit PE ratios.  In other words, despite sustained earnings, US banks remain ridiculously cheap.

Enter the complainers.

Wall Street hates regulation.  There is a natural tension between the motives of short-term profit and long-term sustainability.  Without regulation (and sometimes despite it), the creative minds of Wall Street regularly devise new ways to make vast hordes of money before self-destructing.  It is the loathsome job of government to prevent the latter by preventing the former.

When bankers are complaining about downsizing and frugal compensation, complaining about low leverage (which reduces risk, but also the opportunity to profit), complaining about high capital requirements and complaining about trading restrictions, you know that your money is both profitable and safe.

The greater the number of people who live in fear of bank stocks - while those banks continue to earn excellent profits - the better.

____


"The future looks very dim."

Michael Greenberger, University of Maryland, regarding US Banks

____

The S&P Bank Downgrade

Today, just a day after I wrote an article supporting the purchase of US banks (see below), Standard and Poor's downgraded several of America's largest financial institutions, including Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo.

At first I was taken aback by the move, and even - just for a minute - slightly concerned.  Standard and Poor's said it had changed its ratings system ("with new criteria") for banks, resulting in the sweeping downgrades.

I thought, "Standard and Poor's changed its rating system, and downgraded the US banks?  What if their ratings system is actually correct now?  That's not good."

Then I read that Standard and Poor's had actually upgraded its rating for the crappy China Construction Bank - an overextended lender in a grossly overpriced market.  My concerns melted away.

Generic formulas still can't rate risk.

____


"If merely looking up forward financial data would tell you what the future holds, the Forbes 400 [richest people list] would consist of librarians."

Warren Buffett

____


See also:
Forget Greece and Italy


____

US Banks to Rumble

I’ve been recommending US bank stocks for over a year now – after all, they are powerhouses of future potential. Though bank stocks have risen slightly in the past year (about 15%) there is still far more room to move. And, things are about to get hotter.

Last week, the US Federal Reserve approved buybacks and dividend increases for many of the major banks. JP Morgan, for example, is repurchasing approx. $15 billion worth of shares, having already repurchased $7 billion last year. Wells Fargo jumped its intended share buyback program from $1 billion to $6 billion. What is the significance?

Share buybacks reduce the number of shares outstanding, increasing the amount of earnings per share. For example, if you buy 100 shares today, and the company buys back 30% of its shares, you effectively own 130 shares’ worth of former value. Put another way, if there are $0.50 of earning per share now, a 30% share repurchase would give you $0.65 of earnings per share. Buybacks compound the value of your purchase.

Most banks will be buying back their shares as a mix of common and Trust Preferred Securites (TruPs), the latter of which is really a kind of debt. The common share repurchases will affect earnings per share directly, while the TruP repurchases will effectively decrease debt load and interest payments – all good things.

Stunningly (and wonderfully), despite announcing these huge stock buybacks, bank stocks have traded flat for a week! Why, you may ask?

First off, people still have an intense mistrust of US banks. Stated more bluntly, most people either fear or despise banks, and wouldn't go near them as an investment. For the rational, thoughtful investor, this is a good thing. Bank stocks are likely to remain underpriced for some time.

People also worry that the world economy is unstable, and that the banks will be spending too much money on their stock repurchases instead of holding the money for emergencies. Make no mistake… no bank wants a repeat of 2008 any time soon. Banks are repurchasing their stocks because said stocks are grossly underpriced, and because they can. The banks are sitting on hordes of cash.

Stock symbol XLF (US bank index fund), provides a great way to buy US Bank stocks with a small amount of cash. For the risk tolerant, UYG (the 2X movement stock index fund) is also available.

____


"Superior risk management positioned JPMorgan to capitalize on the crisis."

Barbara Rehm, editor, American Banker

_____


Disclosure

Do not buy stocks, or take this or any other financial advice without doing your own analysis; including, but not limited to: reviewing business models, financial statements, management style and philosophy, recent developments, market macroeconomic analysis, and chart analysis. If you do not know how to do these things, you shouldn't be buying stocks in the first place. Seek the advice of professionals, as appropriate.

_____